My Prime Minister and Sexism

Thank you, Anne Summers, for your article “The gender agenda: Gillard and the politics of sexism” in today’s Age.  I have written, and then discarded several posts on this blog on this very topic, unsure whether I wanted to insert a current political event into what is, on reflection, a rather rag-tag blog.  But Anne Summers, among other things,  is a historian (author of Damned Whores and Gods Police)  and her article encapsulated many of the things that I have sensed about the treatment of Julia Gillard.  And, as I am working through in my own thesis about Judge Willis, “personality” is the most slippery and yet visceral factor in leadership, and when it lies at the heart of a dismissal, it is one of the hardest things to prove.  It is nowhere and it is everywhere.

I have not agreed with everything that Julia Gillard has done (her treatment of Wilkie is a case in point) but I am immensely proud of her as Australia’s first female  Prime Minister.  She is graceful under pressure, she has managed to negotiate with the cross-benchers, and as she has said over and over the last few days, she got things done.  The carbon tax, the mining profits tax, the tapering off of subsidies to private health insurance- these are big policies, passed in the teeth of trenchant criticism by vested interests with very, very deep pockets.  Kevin Rudd did not deliver these: she did.

I was one of the ALP voters who started rolling her eyes and slumping once Rudd began to speak as Prime Minister.  If you look back at my response to his speech at the Bushfire Memorial Service back in 1999 here and again here,  I was troubled by his tin ear and nationalistic grandstanding even then.  Everything was talked up, but nothing happened once the going got tough.

I was delighted that my yet-t0-be-conceived granddaughters will know that a woman can be a Prime Minister.  And yes, I even sent Ms Gillard a birthday card on her 50th birthday, telling her that.

The invective that has been directed towards her by Sydney shock-jocks in particular is appalling, and the criticisms of her “legitimacy” and “authority” (even though Rudd had so little support in the 2010 “coup” that he did not even demand a vote) have an undercurrent that she wasn’t a “proper” Prime Minister.  I liked the quotation from Mary Crooks:

‘Every time someone makes an attack on her authority to lead (as distinct from her policies), they are sending a subliminal message to every woman and girl that they are not welcome to sit at the table of real political power.

As David Marr pointed out on Friday, this is the missing piece of the puzzle over the decision to oust Rudd from the leadership in 2010. It was part of the decency, yes decency, of his colleagues that they did not elaborate on the contribution of his personality to the whole situation then.

I laughed at the irony this morning of Rudd praising “Albo’s” decision to plump for him, channelling every cricket and football captain you’ve ever seen interviewed after a match.  But clearly Rudd is no team player, no matter how many “o”s  he attaches to his colleagues’ names.

We do not have a presidential system: we vote for a local member who is a party member, and it those party members who choose their leader.  Rudd seems to have forgotten his constitutional history.  I’m surprised and disappointed that John Faulkner seems to have done so as well.

And as for Michelle Grattan in The Age?   For the past few weeks, I’ve decided that she falls into the same category as Peter Costello or Chris Berg from the IPA. Her columns are no longer commentary, or analysis: you know what she’s going to write even before she types the first word.

I did not contact my local member Jenny Macklin.  Even if she were a Rudd supporter (which she is not), I would not do so.  Our democracy does not work that way and I think that it is all the better that it does not.  I shall exercise my constitution-given judgment at the ballot box.

Advertisements

8 responses to “My Prime Minister and Sexism

  1. I did not contact my local member, Michael Danby, for the same reason. However I was pleased to note that he is a proud and strong supporter of the prime minister.

    Whatever happens, we (my colleagues, family and friends) will be devastated.
    1. If the prime minister wins, the Opposition will sleaze their way into government at the next election.
    2. If the ex-foreign minister wins, the Opposition will sleaze their way into government at the next election, women everywhere will feel disenfranchised and treachery will have paid off.

  2. I may be very disappointed in our Labor government but history will judge Gillard well. No one could possibly suggest that she was not up to the job and while memory can be a dangerous thing, I don’t remember such a sustained campaign by so many against any PM.

  3. Well said RJ … I have been saying the same thing in recent days. If Julia had been a man I reckon none of this “she done him in” would still be going on so long after the event. It is SO discouraging. Like you, I don’t agree with her on all things either – her stance on gay marriage for example is hugely disappointing – but I’m proud of her too. She’s not charismatic but she’s strong, appears to be collegial, and appears to have warmth. Go Julia tomorrow, I say.

    All this stuff about “we voted Rudd in” shows such a misunderstanding of our system (as you imply above). Even if in reality that’s how people THINK they’re voting, technically that’s not HOW they actually did vote unless of course they were in his electorate.

    Grrr…

  4. PS I nearly did contact my member … I’m not sure I agree with you that that’s not how our democracy works. We elect our member and it is perfectly within the logic of that, I think, to tell them how we think. I’d love to know why you think it isn’t?

    • Even though I have been known to write a letter or two or three to politicians, the real grunt work of policy, and leadership issues, are carried on within the party itself. There’s lots I don’t like about that- in particular, the way that a mandate is claimed for a “platform” which might include a whole range of things that I agree with or disagree with. I don’t know how you get around that. Popular opinion comes into it, in terms of how a policy might be sold to the public or quietly allowed to moulder away on the shelf somewhere, but Rudd’s exhortation to generate “people power”, and to actively whip it up in his own interests, flies in the face of the type of democracy we have.

  5. It’s 2 in the morning, and I can’t sleep because the whole affair has upset me so much! My local member, Wayne Swan, should be at a G20 meeting tomorrow but will be stuck in a caucus meeting instead. One female member of caucus won’t be able to vote because she gave birth last week, and can’t send a proxy – another instance of discrimination against a woman. I’m particularly offended by the way Rudd’s family have acted as his cheer squad – Jessica Rudd on mamamia for instance urging ‘the public’ to contact their local members as if this was Big Brother.

  6. I did contact my member – it’s ‘Albo’! I asked him to support Julia precisely because I felt that Rudd was being unprofessional asking his family to campaign for him. I felt (and said) that it felt to me like a sly dig at Julia’s not having any ‘family’ to do that for her. And this electorate is one that teeters on the edge of ‘going green’, so he is sensitive to messages from his constituents.

    And I was happy at the outcome, and at the fact that Julia has retained A.Albanese in his role, which I’m sure he will continue to handle well.

    • residentjudge

      I was tempted to do the same with my local member- Jenny Macklin- on the grounds that I felt that it was an inappropriate thing to ask people to do. I’m pleased that she kept Albanese on too, which I think says much about both of them. It was obviously a very difficult call for him.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s